INTRODUCTION: AMERICA’S FIGUREHEAD LEADERSHIP
The rise of puppet leadership in America is no longer a fringe theory—it has become a reality that many Americans are waking up to. Joe Biden, who has struggled with cognitive decline and frequent policy missteps, is widely viewed as a puppet of globalist elites. But this dynamic did not start with him. Biden’s presidency is the latest chapter in a long-running saga of figurehead leadership orchestrated by Barack Obama and his inner circle. Now, as Biden’s health falters, Kamala Harris stands ready to carry forward this agenda. However, beneath the surface, the racial and historical narratives used to push these leaders into power reveal a deeper manipulation at play, orchestrated by globalist interests that have little concern for America’s sovereignty or democracy.
OBAMA: VOTED IN ON RACE, NOT ABILITY
Barack Obama’s rise to power is often framed as a groundbreaking moment in American history—a triumph of racial equality. Yet, beneath this narrative lies the uncomfortable truth: Obama was voted into office primarily due to racial sentiment, not his qualifications. Before becoming president, Obama had no significant experience in business, military leadership, or running large organizations. His career as a community organizer and brief stint in the Senate did little to prepare him for the complexities of running a country, let alone one in crisis.
Obama’s connections to influential figures like Oprah Winfrey and Hollywood elites were instrumental in his campaign. Oprah, one of the most powerful media figures in the world, publicly endorsed Obama, helping to galvanize his support among voters. Hollywood followed suit, rallying behind him as a symbol of progress and racial healing. However, this emotional appeal overshadowed the reality that Obama lacked the experience necessary to lead a country through a recession or during wartime(
When a country is at war, it needs a soldier with field experience to lead. When it faces economic turmoil, it needs a businessman who understands the cycles of profit and loss. Obama was neither. His presidency saw a continuation of wars in the Middle East, a sluggish economic recovery after the 2008 financial crisis, and racial tensions that only deepened. Despite his inspiring speeches, Obama’s lack of real-world leadership experience became evident in his failure to navigate the economic and geopolitical challenges that America faced.
BIDEN: OBAMA’S PUPPET AND GLOBALIST CHOICE
Though Obama privately criticized Biden, referring to him as an “idiot” and warning, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f*** things up,” he still endorsed Biden for president. Why? The answer likely lies in maintaining control. By putting Biden in office, Obama ensured that his influence, and the policies of his administration, would continue under a familiar face(
Washington Examiner). But Biden’s cognitive decline and lack of strong leadership made him the perfect puppet for globalist interests, who now had a compliant figure in the Oval Office to push their agenda forward.
HARRIS: THE NEXT IN LINE
As Biden’s capabilities come under increasing scrutiny, Kamala Harris is being prepped to take over. Much like Obama and Biden before her, Harris brings little to the table in terms of experience. Her career has been defined by opportunism—adopting whatever positions are most politically expedient at the time. Harris, a former California prosecutor, failed to gain significant traction during her presidential campaign and was seen as a weak candidate by many within her own party. Yet, despite her shortcomings, she was elevated to the role of vice president, once again proving that the Democratic Party is more focused on promoting figureheads than qualified leaders.
Harris’s rise is part of a larger pattern: Obama was elected president, followed by his vice president, Biden. Now, Biden’s vice president, Harris, is set to continue this legacy of puppet leadership, ensuring that the same globalist forces maintain control. This concentration of power within a small circle of individuals, with global elites pulling the strings, threatens the very foundation of American democracy.
TRUMP: A BUSINESSMAN WITH REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE
In stark contrast to Obama, Biden, and Harris stands Donald Trump. Though loathed by Democrats and many within the political establishment, Trump brought to the presidency something Obama and his successors never had—real-world business experience. Trump, a long-time businessman, understood the complexities of the economy. He had faced financial ruin, declared bankruptcy, and yet managed to rebuild his empire, an experience that gave him a deep understanding of risk, reward, and resilience.
Under Trump’s leadership, America experienced some of its greatest economic years. He led the country out of recession, significantly lowered unemployment, and brought manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. Trump’s policies of tax cuts and deregulation spurred economic growth, and despite constant opposition from the media and Democrats, his tenure saw real progress on issues like trade, immigration, and national security.
Notably, Trump’s appeal extended beyond the Republican base. Recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-term Democrat, switched sides and endorsed Trump, recognizing the importance of strong, experienced leadership over figurehead governance. Kennedy, a man of deep intellect and historical understanding, saw in Trump the qualities necessary to steer America away from the control of globalist puppets who were voted in on the back of racial sentiment rather than competence(
THE RISE OF RACIAL TENSIONS AND THE THREAT OF CIVIL WAR
The policies of Obama, Biden, and Harris have done little to heal America’s racial divides. In fact, many argue that their focus on identity politics has only deepened the rift between races, leading to increased polarization. Obama’s presidency saw the rise of movements like Black Lives Matter, which, while aiming to address police brutality, contributed to a growing sense of division within the country.
Poor policies, combined with a divisive narrative, have set the stage for what some fear could become a new civil war—this time not over geography, but race. The rise in racial tensions, driven by the manipulation of historical narratives, has created an environment ripe for conflict. The globalists behind these policies are using racial issues as a tool to divide and weaken America from within.
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SLAVE TRADE
The uncomfortable truth about the slave trade is often overlooked in contemporary discussions about race. Long before Europeans arrived on African shores, Africans were capturing and selling their own people into slavery. Arab traders were the first to exploit this market, followed by Europeans. The narrative that slavery was solely a European crime ignores the role that African leaders played in perpetuating the trade.
Moreover, African American slave owners like Anthony Johnson played a pivotal role in shaping early American slavery. Johnson, a former indentured servant, became one of the first black slave owners in America. His legal battle to keep his black slave set a precedent that allowed for the extension of slavery in the colonies. White Americans, by contrast, fought and killed each other during the Civil War to end slavery—a fact often overshadowed by the contemporary narrative of white guilt(
GLOBALISTS, RACIAL DIVISION, AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA
The globalists, working through Obama, Biden, and Harris, have no interest in healing America’s racial wounds. Instead, they are using race as a tool to further divide the nation, weaken democracy, and centralize control. By promoting leaders based on racial sentiment rather than competence, they are setting America on a path toward racial conflict and civil strife.
At the same time, nations like China, which do not practice multiculturalism, are growing stronger, waiting for the moment when a racially weakened America can no longer defend itself. With advanced technologies like hypersonic nuclear weapons, China is positioning itself to take advantage of America’s internal divisions, potentially leading to a global shift in power that could spell the end of American dominance.
CONCLUSION: A CALL TO RECLAIM DEMOCRACY
America stands at a crossroads. Will the nation continue to elect figureheads, promoted by globalists, based on racial sentiment and divisive narratives? Or will it return to leaders who have real-world experience, who understand the complexities of business, governance, and the economy? The choice will determine whether America continues to lead the world as a beacon of democracy or falls prey to globalist manipulation, racial division, and eventual destruction.
