ACTIVE SHOOTERS: Are Globalists, Democrats and the CIA behind the mass shootings in America?

And are these shootings part of a larger plan to create chaos and destroy America and Democracy?

In recent years, the United States has been shaken by an alarming increase in school shootings and public mass shootings. These tragic events have sparked national debates over gun control, mental health, and the deeper causes of violence. But are these incidents random acts of violence, or is something more deliberate at play? Could globalists, certain political factions, and even intelligence agencies like the CIA be orchestrating these events to destabilize America, dismantle the Second Amendment, and weaken democracy?

This article delves into these concerns, exploring both sides of the argument and investigating whether these shootings are part of a broader plan to create chaos, dismantle American democracy, and pave the way for control by global elites.

WHY THE REJECTION OF ACTIVE SHOOTER TRAINING RAISES QUESTIONS

Years ago, I was involved with a company that trains the U.S. Military in counter-terrorism. Our team created an active shooter training program designed to help students, teachers, and civilians protect themselves in the event of a shooting. I approached the head of the U.S. school system to offer this program. Strangely, he seemed uninterested, dismissing the idea.

This response raised serious questions for me: Why would someone responsible for the safety of American children reject a program that could save lives? Was there a hidden agenda behind the rise of school shootings, involving globalists, political forces, and intelligence agencies like the CIA? This encounter pushed me into writing political articles, as I began to distrust politicians and government officials who seem to prioritize their own interests over the welfare of the American people.

THE ROLE OF THE CIA, GLOBALISTS, AND DEMOCRATS

On one side of the argument, people point to America’s high rate of gun ownership and societal problems like mental health issues as contributing factors to mass shootings. However, others believe that something more sinister may be at play: a coordinated effort by globalists, Democrats, and intelligence agencies to create chaos, weaken democracy, and dismantle the Second Amendment.

1. CIA AND GLOBALIST BACKING

Some theorists believe mass shootings are part of a broader plan executed by CIA-backed and globalist-aligned forces. The goal of these shootings is to create fear, which then justifies stricter gun control laws. By dismantling the Second Amendment, they argue, these groups can disarm the American public, making citizens easier to control. Without the right to bear arms, Americans would be defenseless against potential government overreach and globalist agendas.

2. MK ULTRA AND HANDPICKED SHOOTERS

There are suspicions that mass shooters may be handpicked or manipulated through covert government programs like MK Ultra, a CIA initiative that once explored mind control. Could some of these shooters be selected to carry out violent acts to serve a hidden agenda? This would provide a way for those in power to push for stricter gun laws while destabilizing the nation from within.

3. DESTROYING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO CRUSH DEMOCRACY

The Second Amendment, which guarantees the right to bear arms, is seen by many as a cornerstone of American liberty. It not only protects the right to self-defense but also serves as a safeguard against tyranny. The concern is that mass shootings are being used as a pretext to enact stricter gun control laws, which would eventually disarm the American population, leaving citizens defenseless against potential government overreach. The dismantling of the Second Amendment could pave the way for a One World Order, consolidating power in the hands of a few global elites and making it impossible for the public to resist further control.

A HISTORY OF MASS SHOOTINGS

Mass shootings in the United States have become an increasingly frequent occurrence. While gun violence has always been a concern, the modern wave of mass public shootings seems to have surged after significant political and societal shifts. Below is a chronological list of major mass shootings in the U.S., along with their death tolls:

August 1, 1966: University of Texas Tower Shooting, Austin, Texas – 14 killed
July 18, 1984: McDonald’s Massacre, San Ysidro, California – 21 killed
October 16, 1991: Luby’s Cafeteria, Killeen, Texas – 23 killed
April 20, 1999: Columbine High School, Littleton, Colorado – 13 killed
April 16, 2007: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia – 32 killed
November 5, 2009: Fort Hood, Texas – 13 killed
December 14, 2012: Sandy Hook Elementary School, Newtown, Connecticut – 26 killed
June 12, 2016: Pulse Nightclub, Orlando, Florida – 49 killed
October 1, 2017: Las Vegas Strip, Las Vegas, Nevada – 60 killed
November 5, 2017: First Baptist Church, Sutherland Springs, Texas – 26 killed
February 14, 2018: Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, Parkland, Florida – 17 killed
May 18, 2018: Santa Fe High School, Santa Fe, Texas – 10 killed
August 3, 2019: Walmart, El Paso, Texas – 23 killed
August 4, 2019: Dayton, Ohio – 9 killed
May 24, 2022: Robb Elementary School, Uvalde, Texas – 21 killed
January 22, 2023: Monterey Park, California – 11 killed
January 23, 2023: Half Moon Bay, California – 7 killed
April 28, 2023: Louisville Bank Shooting, Louisville, Kentucky – 5 killed
November 15, 2023: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia – 3 killed
September 4, 2024: Barrow County, Georgia – 5 killed

This timeline of mass shootings leads us to question: Are these tragedies coinciding with significant political changes or globalist agendas? Did the rise in mass shootings correspond with the push for multiculturalism, the degradation of family values, or shifts in political leadership? Could there be a deliberate effort to destabilize American society as a means of weakening its democratic institutions?

THE GUN CONTROL DEBATE: WOULD DISARMING AMERICANS MAKE THEM SAFER?

The national debate over gun control has intensified in response to these shootings. Proponents of gun control argue that stricter laws would reduce the number of shootings. Critics, however, argue that disarming law-abiding citizens will only embolden criminals and leave Americans vulnerable to government overreach.

1. ARE THE SHOOTERS RESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERS?

Most mass shooters are not responsible gun owners who respect the right to bear arms. Instead, they are often individuals with mental health issues or personal grievances. The vast majority of American gun owners use their firearms for protection, hunting, or sport, and do not engage in violent acts. Critics argue that gun control unfairly targets responsible citizens and will not prevent mass shootings.

2. DOES GUN CONTROL WORK?

Critics of gun control argue that criminals, by definition, do not follow laws. Disarming law-abiding citizens will not prevent criminals from accessing firearms. Additionally, history has shown that disarming a population can lead to authoritarian regimes, as governments become the only entities with access to weapons.

THE CIA AND INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES: ARE THEY INVOLVED?

There are growing concerns that intelligence agencies, including the CIA, are involved in manipulating these shootings for political ends. Some theorists believe that these agencies are working in concert with globalist forces to create chaos and justify stricter gun control measures.

1. MASS SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL

The CIA and other intelligence agencies within the Five Eyes alliance (the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) have vast surveillance capabilities. Critics argue that these agencies could be monitoring and even influencing vulnerable individuals, potentially pushing them toward acts of violence to further a hidden agenda.

2. ORCHESTRATING MASS SHOOTINGS

The theory is that intelligence agencies are deliberately orchestrating mass shootings to destabilize the country, create fear, and push for gun control. Once the public is sufficiently disarmed, it will be far easier for globalist forces to impose their will on a defenseless population.

IS CHINA PART OF THE GLOBALIST AGENDA OR A RIVAL?

China is an important player in this conversation. Unlike many Western nations, China has maintained a strong national identity and resisted the push for multiculturalism. While the West becomes more divided through social fragmentation and cultural degradation, China appears to be growing stronger.

Some suggest that China’s surveillance technology and centralized control model represent a future that globalists may want to emulate. Others believe that China, far from being a pawn of globalists, may be positioning itself as a rival to Western-led globalist agendas. Either way, China’s role in this larger narrative cannot be ignored.

CONCLUSION: THE COST OF CHAOS AND THE IMPORTANCE OF DEMOCRACY

Each mass shooting leaves behind a trail of devastation, not just for the families directly affected, but for the entire nation. Lives are shattered, trust in society erodes, and the public’s sense of security is undermined. As these tragedies unfold, it’s essential that we ask the difficult questions: Is this simply the result of societal decay, or is there a more orchestrated effort at play? Could globalists, intelligence agencies, and political factions be deliberately using these violent incidents to push an agenda that would ultimately weaken American democracy?

The mainstream media often follows a predictable narrative—highlighting the shooter’s background, discussing mental health, and advocating for stricter gun control—without deeply investigating the possibility of a more complex, organized plot. Why does the media rarely question who benefits from the chaos, and why is there such little focus on who could be influencing or orchestrating these events?

America’s Constitution was designed to protect its citizens from tyranny, with the Second Amendment standing as a safeguard for liberty. If these shootings are being used to undermine the Constitution and weaken democracy, then it’s crucial to hold those responsible accountable. Failing to investigate these possibilities means turning a blind eye to potential manipulation, which could ultimately strip Americans of their rights and freedoms.

As a nation, we owe it to the countless lives lost to these shootings—and to the families destroyed by this violence—to get to the bottom of who is truly behind these tragedies. It’s not enough to accept the surface-level explanations that are presented to us. We must ask why, and we must demand justice for those who have been impacted. Without real answers and accountability, the cycle of violence will continue, and with it, the erosion of America’s democratic foundations.

This is not just about destroying white culture, as some critics of globalism might claim. It’s about destroying all cultures, all identities, and all countries, creating a world where no one has anything left to fight for. Instead of helping all races, countries, and cultures build their own American dream and cultivate their own constitutional freedoms, the agenda seems to be one of dismantling those very dreams and imposing a homogenized, controllable society.

And finally, in the struggle for human free will, we must consider the question of influence. If there is a God and a Satan, is it wrong for either of them to manipulate or control mankind during our quest for self-determination? As Ecclesiastes 8:9 reminds us, when man dominates man, it is to his injury. Can humanity successfully rule itself without falling prey to manipulation, or will we continue to succumb to forces—both seen and unseen—that seek to control our destiny?